Michael Ignatieff Starts To Look Like a Leader

I would suggest that after his performance in the House of Commons on Thursday, December 10th., Michael Ignatieff  Deserves A Second Chance…even though I do not agree with some of his earlier positions.

On Thursday the 10th.,  he took a big step toward becoming a real leader and the Mainstream Media missed it altogether.

But then what else is new?

Radio, TV, the Toronto Globe, Star, Sun, the Vancouver papers…the ones in Quebec and the West and Eastern Canada…don’t want to take the time to bring us the real news.

I submit – this is real news.

CANADA-POLITICS/

Ignatieff’s sponsorship of a motion in the House of Commons on December 10th., calling for the release of uncensored documents concerning the treatment of Afghan citizens arrested by Canadian soldiers and transferred to Afghan jails.

It’s evidence that perhaps his Party would be wrong to dump him.

Here’s some of what he said on Thursday concerning his motion:

“We need a full independent public inquiry into the government’s year of wilful blindness. This is not a partisan exercise because we are prepared on this side of the House for the inquiry to examine the whole length of the mission in Afghanistan beginning in 2001 under the previous Liberal government.”

Incidentally…Ignatieff is calling the Conservative bluff by offering to review the Liberal performance as well. That is real “bi-partisanship”

He went on….

“In March 2006, the U.S. State Department reported that Afghan authorities, and I quote: “tortured and abused detainees on a regular basis.” However, despite this information, the Conservative government carried on as usual. And a few weeks later, in spring 2006, the first detainees were transferred by the Canadian Forces.

In May 2006 Richard Colvin began sending reports of detainee abuse to his superiors.

On June 2, 2006, the Afghan independent human rights commission reported that a third of detainees handed over by Canadian Forces were abused or tortured in Afghan custody. On that same day Richard Colvin sent another memo with reports of torture in Afghan jails. Still the government did nothing.

Mr. Colvin sent three more reports before the end of 2006. He made additional reports in March, April, June and July 2007. Yet, 17 months, 17 memos, and still the government did nothing.

In 2006, the Canadian Embassy in Kabul had a report on human rights stating that torture was systematic in Afghan prisons. Once again, the government did nothing.

It was during the summer of 2006 that the detainee abuse confirmed yesterday by General Natynczyk took place. It was documented and reported by soldiers in the field who did their job. Still the government did not do its job.

In November 2006 the Department of Foreign Affairs actually issued talking points playing down reports of torture. Secret memos leaked to the press confirmed that the government’s priority was spinning the issue rather than preventing torture from occurring.

In February 2007, there were three additional allegations of detainee abuse. That same month, the military police complaints commission initiated an investigation that was blocked by the government.

The government’s year of wilful blindness only ended when graphic reports of abuse surfaced in the Canadian press on April 23, 2007.”

This is a leader speaking.

And then, the coup de grace…pushing the knife home and twisting it just enough:

“Nevertheless, until yesterday, this minister (MacKay) and this government claimed that no detainee transferred by the Canadian military had been abused in Afghan prisons.

We now know this is not true.”

Perhaps Bob Ray was right…It’s not about changing leaders…it’s about acting on principle.

5

Responses to “Michael Ignatieff Starts To Look Like a Leader”

lord anthony

A curious situation indeed. We are lurching towards an election with a no-brainer outcome.

Out with Harper and his cabal, big gains for Bloc and NDP.
I could live with that.

Mainstream voters are reluctant to give the Libs blank cheques and blind trust any more, after the sponsorship deal.
We never even found out who authorised signing those cheques, I still think Paul Martin “walked” on that one instead of facing criminal charges.

In mitigation, he demolished our deficit, which we now have back in abundance.

But all of that, in the end….. was only money, sucking, licking and backscratching, endemic political malfeasance which will never be eradicated. Disgusting, but to be expected in Ottawa or any other parliament.
What are friends if they don’t look after each other, eh.

But today’s moral crisis in Canada is far more worrying, to the point of dumping the grotesque Conservative baby with the bathwater, just to be on the safe side.
We are not torturers, nor will we stand for sleazy covering-up in high elected office.

I think Canadian voters are heading that way.

And I’m surprised there has been no focus yet on our uniforms over there. They’re the the smoking guns in Colvingate.

What was the accountability tipping-point in Somalia?

Jim

Yes.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay has a tendency to change ground without apology, or even a blush. As a result, he suffers what might be charitably called a trust deficit — and it pre-dates this week’s unpleasantness over Afghan detainees.

The crux of this whole matter is the coverup; the lying; the willingness to sacrifice honour on the altar of power.

There’s an excellent article on MacKay here…

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/MacKay+tangled/2328007/story.html

lord anthony

Both of you are kinder than the truth, which is that MacKay sets a creepy new low in the horrible possibilities of our electoral system.

It is likely before he is prodded into ignominy he will become a sacrificial anode as Harper’s regime collapses.

To which I can only add:

burn baby burn

paul mcarthur

Thanks to the two of you for keeping me appraised of the domestic political scene. I appreciate it. I wonder with Craig Murray recently becoming more vocal about the torture in Uzbekistan, and the toothless inquiry into the Iraq war across the pond and this recent stand for truth in Canada whether we may be entering a period in which politicians realize they have to admit some of the ugly truths to maintain a slight veneer of respectability to the masses who can’t perceive the depths of the ugliness of the full truth? It, combined with the backlash of the blind, ignorant racists like the commenter here from the Ottawa Citizen article -”What a load of crap,it seems most of the comments are just a load of liberal

crap.So they turn these murderas of women and children not to mention

the troops over to the Afghans its where they should go.”-

should be enough to allow the deeper truths to stay hidden and the relative status quo to persevere and (though I did like his quoted words in Parliament) Michael Ignatieff certainly represents, in the larger picture – the status quo.

Jim

I agree that in some ways, he represents the “status quo”.

But who else is there???

Leave a Reply