<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada The United States NATO Stare Into The Eyes of Defeat In Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan</link>
	<description>politics; books; musings on Canada and the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reedwrites.ca/?p=1052#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Yes my pink friend, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes my pink friend, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fadingpinko</title>
		<link>http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-1554</link>
		<dc:creator>fadingpinko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reedwrites.ca/?p=1052#comment-1554</guid>
		<description>If Canadian troops have not abused the locals they will be a historical first.
Can any one point to an example of armed occupation of someone else&#039;s country that was not followed by resentment and resistance to it leading inexorably to repressive actions by the occupying troops .
Indeed Hillier&#039;s &#039;scumbags&#039; characterisation of the resisting Afghans would seemm to have pre-determined the developement of a bad attitude by his soldiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Canadian troops have not abused the locals they will be a historical first.<br />
Can any one point to an example of armed occupation of someone else&#8217;s country that was not followed by resentment and resistance to it leading inexorably to repressive actions by the occupying troops .<br />
Indeed Hillier&#8217;s &#8217;scumbags&#8217; characterisation of the resisting Afghans would seemm to have pre-determined the developement of a bad attitude by his soldiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim reed</title>
		<link>http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>jim reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reedwrites.ca/?p=1052#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>I felt that was a confusing report.

Canadian soldiers have not been accused of mistreating, beating or torturing any Afghans...at least not publicly.

However 6 complaints of mistreatment -not torture- were made against soldiers and the military police have been investigating...clearing all but one, which is still ongoing.

On the other hand...a number of soldiers including a couple of military policemen have complained to the Military Police Complaints Commission, which is a quasi-judicial body, but not a military body.

That&#039;s the one that Harper shut down in the middle of things, firing the chairman by not extending his term and effectively terminating those hearings.

This Harper fellow is crafty one. 

I found that the CBC report was a bit confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt that was a confusing report.</p>
<p>Canadian soldiers have not been accused of mistreating, beating or torturing any Afghans&#8230;at least not publicly.</p>
<p>However 6 complaints of mistreatment -not torture- were made against soldiers and the military police have been investigating&#8230;clearing all but one, which is still ongoing.</p>
<p>On the other hand&#8230;a number of soldiers including a couple of military policemen have complained to the Military Police Complaints Commission, which is a quasi-judicial body, but not a military body.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the one that Harper shut down in the middle of things, firing the chairman by not extending his term and effectively terminating those hearings.</p>
<p>This Harper fellow is crafty one. </p>
<p>I found that the CBC report was a bit confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lord anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.reedwrites.ca/current-affairs/canada-the-united-states-nato-stare-into-the-eyes-of-defeat-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>lord anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reedwrites.ca/?p=1052#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>CBC tells us.....
All allegations of mistreatment of Afghan prisoners by Canadian troops investigated so far have been unfounded, the Canadian Forces Military Police said Monday night.

And a blogger comments, that&#039;s like your mom telling the principal what kind of a kid you are when she&#039;s been called to the office on account of your misbehaviour, what else would she say.

Let me guess. MoD pays CFMP salaries...?
Talk about just-in-time delivery!

This stinks of political interference. Something else to look into.

Now for the real investigation.
Amnesty Int. would be a fitting sponsor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBC tells us&#8230;..<br />
All allegations of mistreatment of Afghan prisoners by Canadian troops investigated so far have been unfounded, the Canadian Forces Military Police said Monday night.</p>
<p>And a blogger comments, that&#8217;s like your mom telling the principal what kind of a kid you are when she&#8217;s been called to the office on account of your misbehaviour, what else would she say.</p>
<p>Let me guess. MoD pays CFMP salaries&#8230;?<br />
Talk about just-in-time delivery!</p>
<p>This stinks of political interference. Something else to look into.</p>
<p>Now for the real investigation.<br />
Amnesty Int. would be a fitting sponsor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
