reed writes

Mr. Harper may be mixing his religious beliefs with his politics.

I won’t waste a lot of space here with irrelevant ramblings. What is contained in the links below is just too important.

Incidentally – I am a Christian…but nevertheless, I abhor religious extremists of any variety.

Check out these links and stay calm.

1. Why Stephen Harper doesn’t talk publicy about his faith.

2. Who is getting the cushy government jobs?

Someone who occasionally comments here at reedwrites and has had personal experience with asbestos, writes about the problem from his point of view. We present it in the form of a letter.

Why Asbestos From Canada Will Continue to be a Problem

by Bill Desmond

Dear Jim and Barbara

anti asbestos poster

Sad to say, we will continue to export it and workers and the public will continue to die.

And this is why-

Canadian Asbestos Mining is based mainly in Quebec and is one of the  largest employers in the Eastern Townships., with several thousand workers involved.

The Government of Canada has, over the years and in order to curry votes, given Quebec – “Nation status”, with their own immigration policies, pensions, a lion’s share of transfer payments, the ability to ban English from signs and schools, predominance in the civil service and the military (one of the main reasons separation is feared) and many votes in the federal House of Commons.

No government forms a majority without winning Quebec, who, pragmatic always, vote with the prevailing wind, primarily in their own interest naturally. Hence, the Bloc Quebecois, which will, by the way, soon  form her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition in the coming Harper Majority- much to my disgust.

( You undoubtedly know all this, Jim, even though you may not agree fully).

So the Canadian government will not ban asbestos, or close up the mines, and certainly this Conservative government, as previous Liberal governments, will do nothing to hassle Corporations.

• People will have to continue to die,
• because profits have to (and will) be made,
• taxes will have to be paid,
• the shareholders must realize a return on their investments,

Federal governments of any stripe will have to toady to the Quebecois till they or we decide we’ve had enough.

On a personal note, I’ve seen asbestos in use recently, and over the years, in India. Its used there for roofing- large sheets of it – two by eight and four by eight- most housing seems to use it. I’ve slept under it for months at a time. If its not cut or drilled into I’m willing to believe its less of a problem there than so many other hazards especially diesel pollution.

The workers who cut it, and install it no doubt suffer from its effects, or would, if their poverty, malnutrition and other diseases didn’t finish them off sooner.

So lets see – thousands of corporate jobs in Quebec, where the workers  who do suffer any effects are dying off and the workers in developing ( a nice word for poor and exploited) countries are just poor sods who don’t really count- at least not where politics and money are concerned.

As for American workers dying of asbestos poisoning? My heart goes out to them and their families. But their politicians are worse (if possible) whores than ours, and Public Health care, paid by taxes, with the well-off paying for the poor, is not and will not be an option there in the foreseeable future.

Sincerely,

Bill

Additional information can be found here.

Asbestos-related disease is discussed here.

The Magic but Deadly Mineral

Asbestos was once called the “magic mineral”, a unique resource that would bring wealth and prosperity to Canada.

It was woven into clothes, building insulation and coffee pots. It was even mixed with children’s play dough and, at one point, had roughly 4,000 other applications.

What Canadians didn’t realize at the time was that we were setting the scene for a yet-to-be-discovered cancer epidemic.

Workers at a Canadian Asbestos Mine

In the 1960s and ’70s, Canadian asbestos miners started coughing up blood; suddenly the the glitter was gone. Canada has spent the last 20-plus years trying to rid our homes, schools and offices — including Parliament Hill — of the dangerous dust.

Our hospitals are still dealing with the after effects. Many occupational health clinics register one new patient a day with asbestos-related cancer, such as mesothelioma, something I have just learned about from an American colleague, Barbara O’Brien.

Worldwide, about 125 million people are exposed to asbestos at work and at least 90,000 die each year from asbestos-related diseases, according to the World Health Organization.

Many of the people suffering from asbestos-related cancer are Americans…something that we here in Canada should recognize…because we sold the stuff to them.

American journalist Barbara O’Brien writes on the topic of cancer caused by asbestos, because so many Americans are suffering from it. One of its names is “mesothelioma”.

As we all know, the United States Congress is struggling to reform the way in which the country’s health care is delivered.

Canadians who suffer from asbestos-related disease are treated free of charge by the Canadian universal healthcare system; American sufferers are not so lucky.

This is a recent article by Ms. O’Brien on the subject as she tries to shed light on the continuing problem

WOULD HEALTH CARE REFORM HELP YOU

Many obstacles and stumbling blocks remain in the way of health care reform. The House and Senate bills will have to be merged, and then the House and Senate both will vote on the final bill. We don’t yet know what will be in the final bill, or if the final bill will be passed into law. Passage will be especially difficult in the Senate, where it will need 60 votes to pass. It is still possible that after all this angst, just one grandstanding senator could kill the whole thing.

But just for fun, let’s look at what conventional wisdom says will be in the final bill and see if there is anything in it that will be an immediate benefit to people with  cancer (mesothelioma) and other asbestos-related disease.

It is likely that the final bill will provide additional funding for state high-risk insurance pools. Currently more than 30 states run such pools, which are nonprofit, state-sponsored health insurance plans for people who can’t buy insurance because of pre-existing conditions. The biggest problem with such pools is that, often, the insurance they offer is too expensive for many who might need it. Both the Senate and House bills provide $5 billion in subsidies for state high-risk pools to make the insurance more affordable.

Under the Senate bill, beginning in 2014, private companies would no longer be able to deny coverage to adults with pre-existing conditions, nor could they charge higher premiums for people with pre-existing conditions. Until then, the state high-risk pools could provide some help.

Closing the Medicare Part D coverage gap — also called the “doughnut hole” — is another potential provision that could help some patients with asbestos-related disease. The “doughnut hole” is the gap between the coverage for yearly out-of-pocket expenses provided by Medicare Part D and Medicare’s “catastrophic coverage” threshold.

For example, in 2009 Medicare Part D paid at least 75 percent of what patients paid for prescription drugs up to $2,700. After that, patients must pay for all of their prescription medications until what they have paid exceeds $6,154. At that point, the catastrophic coverage takes over, and Medicare pays for all but 5 percent of the patient’s drug bills. The final health care reform bill probably will provide for paying at least 50 percent of out-of-pocket costs in the doughnut hole.

You may have heard the bills include budget cuts to the Medicare program, and this has been a big concern to many people. Proponents of the bill insist that savings can be found to pay for the cuts, and that people who depend on Medicare won’t face reduced services. But this is a complex issue that I want to address in a later post.

The long-term provisions probably will include many other provisions that would benefit patients with asbestos-related disease, including increased funding for medical research. Although there are many complaints about the bill coming from all parts of the political spectrum, on the whole it would be a huge benefit to many people.

— Barbara O’Brien

You can read more on this subject by clicking here.