Hailed as a monument to the history of literacy, the first episode last night was… umm, watchable. But I’m sure TVO wouldn’t want us to luxuriate in literary smugness with our intellectual radar shut down. That would be an insult and disservice to this eight year magnum opus.
But could EOW provoke debate for the wrong reasons? I’m a bit resentful. Now I have to go researching because I watched it last night and was left with Two Big questions.
1) The 2003 ravaging of the Iraq Museum in Baghdad: EOW attributed it to “a mob” but I remember seeing the tearful curator on tv news telling how US military came and left as if they had a shopping-list. A mob may have been involved, as may have US mercenaries, likely, but I don’t know.
But I do know the plundering was facilitated by the United States of America.
Why not give them the credit?
2) The trashing of the Alexandria museum and (my addition) the brutal deaths of Hypatia and her colleagues wasn’t at the hands of the Romans, it was early Christian zealots.
I will have to watch all the EOW episodes now, then go digging some more to find out if EOW is in the history-sanitisation business.
I suppose that’s a good thing, but in my house there’s all these books waiting to be read.