The debate over Western strategy in Afghanistan continues and becomes more heated by the day.
As new documents are released concerning the debate within Soviet ruling circles in the 1980’s…we can see some parallels between the Soviet experience and the Western (read U.S. one).
Should there be a troop surge or not?
Was anything to be gained by continuing to prop up a puppet government?
Should the Red Army stay the course or pull out?
The government in Moscow was divided against itself….with some on one side and some on the other. Many in the Soviet military believed that the war could not be won by force of arms. Others pomoted the “surge” theory and said…”send in more soldiers and we can win “.
Criticism of the Soviet policy of national reconciliation in Afghanistan and analysis of general failures of the Soviet military mission there were presented by a Colonel Tsagolov to USSR Defense Minister Dmitry Yazov of August 13, 1987. His letter represents the first criticism of the Afghan war from within the military establishment. Colonel Tsagolov paid for his attempt to make his criticism public in an interview with Soviet influential progressive magazine “Ogonek”. He was expelled from the Army in 1988.
But Tsagalov was right.
Still, -the Russian military continue to insist – even today – that they were not defeated in Afghanistan. Nevertheless they and their political Masters achieved none of their limited political aims: -to stabilise the government - to secure the towns, train up the army and police.
Like the Canadian General – Rick Hillier – Russian military leaders boasted they could fix things and leave within six months.
They were wrong. And so was Hillier.
The Russian/Soviet experience in Afghanistan is very instructive.
As one Russian General ruefully remarked: “We tried to teach the Afghans how to build a new and decent society, knowing that we ourselves had failed to do so … Our army was given tasks which it was in no position to fulfil, since no regular army can possibly solve the problems of a territory in revolt.” He was right.
Western soldiers were assigned a mission they could not possibly fulfill.
And so we are left on the horns of a dilemma.
Please write a comment and let’s see if we can advance this story just a bit.
The debate over Western strategy in Afghanistan continues and becomes more heated by the day.
As new information is released concerning the debate within Soviet ruling circles in the 1980’s…we can see some parallels between the Soviet experience and the Western (read U.S.) one.
Should there be a troop surge or not?
Was anything to be gained by continuing to prop up a puppet government?
Should the Red Army stay the course or pull out?
The government in Moscow was divided against itself….with some on one side and some on the other. Many in the Soviet military believed that the war could not be won by force of arms. Others promoted the “surge” theory and said…”send in more soldiers and we can win “.
Criticism of the Soviet policy of national reconciliation in Afghanistan and analysis of general failures of the Soviet military mission there were presented by a Colonel Tsagolov to USSR Defense Minister Dmitry Yazov of August 13, 1987. His letter represents the first criticism of the Afghan war from within the military establishment. Colonel Tsagolov paid for his attempt to make his criticism public in an interview with Soviet influential progressive magazine “Ogonek”. He was expelled from the Army in 1988.
But Tsagalov was right.
Still, -the Russian military continue to insist – even today – that they were not defeated in Afghanistan. Nevertheless they and their political Masters achieved none of their limited political aims: -to stabilise the government - to secure the towns, train up the army and police.
Like the Canadian General – Rick Hillier – Russian military leaders boasted they could fix things and leave within six months.
They were wrong. And so was Hillier. And so is Hillier’s hero Petraeus.
The Russian/Soviet experience in Afghanistan is very instructive.
As one Russian General remarked: “We tried to teach them how to build a new and decent society, knowing that we ourselves had failed to do so … Our army was given tasks which it was in no position to fulfil. No regular army can possibly solve the problems of a territory in revolt.” He was right.
Western soldiers were assigned a mission they could not possibly fulfill.
And so we are left on the horns of a dilemma.
Please write a comment and let’s see if we can advance this story just a bit.
I recommend anyone who is in the least interested, to visit this site.